Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than the LG V20, having an 81.9 score against 77. The Google Pixel 4 is a extremely newer and just a bit lighter cellphone than LG V20, but it is also a little bit thicker. LG V20 counts with a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V20 also has a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a bit higher number of pixels in each display inch.
LG V20 features a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V20 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better performance than LG V20, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
The LG V20 features a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 14% more battery size. The LG V20 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V20 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy LG V20, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.