Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2017-09-21 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is slightly better than LG V30's 79.1 overall score. Google Pixel 4's construction is noticeably newer than LG V30's, although it's just a little thicker and a bit heavier. LG V30 counts with a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a little bit bigger display, a just a bit higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 4 has a bit better performance than LG V30, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG V30 features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG V30 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V30 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG V30 also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations and a camera with a lot better 16 mega pixels resolution.
LG V30 features longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has an 18 percent larger battery size.
Google Pixel 4 costs a bit more money than the LG V30, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.