Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's global score of 76.4. Google Pixel 4's body is newer, a little bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels amount per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 4 features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a back camera with a lot better 20.7 mega pixels resolution.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel 4, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.