Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's score of 77.9. The Google Pixel 4 is a newer cellphone, and it's also just a bit lighter and a lot thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Google Pixel 4 has a bit superior CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better looking display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and slower 24 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Motorola DROID Turbo and Google Pixel 4 both have quite similar memory to store more apps and games, both have the same internal storage capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.