Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 global score. The Google Pixel 4 design is somewhat lighter than Motorola Edge 50, but it is just a bit thicker and was released 5 years before. The Google Pixel 4 has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 50 features a better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a bit better pixel density, a bigger screen and a quite better 1220 x 2712px resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79 percent greater battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP and a much bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.