Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Moto G Stylus's global score of 79.7. The Google Pixel 4 design is thinner and lighter than the Moto G Stylus, even when they were released only a couple of months apart. Google Pixel 4 has a little faster CPU than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater display pixels density. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a superior camera than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Google Pixel 4 costs a bit more money than Motorola Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.