Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than the Moto Z4, having an 81.9 score against 79.8. The Google Pixel 4 body is just a bit lighter but a bit thicker than Moto Z4, and both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch.
Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 4 has a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto Z4 has better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity. Motorola Moto Z4 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rates and a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a way larger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 4 is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.