Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A12, with a score of 81.9 against 80.3. The Google Pixel 4 design is a little bit thinner and notably lighter than Galaxy A12, even though it was released about a year before. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better display density and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels. The Galaxy A12 has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy A12 also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution.
The Galaxy A12 features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A12 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A12 has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.