Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 443 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4's general score of 81.9. The Galaxy A32 construction is newer than Google Pixel 4's, although it's somewhat thicker and heavier. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better display pixels density and a much higher 1080 x 2280px resolution. Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 takes much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.