Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is better than Google Pixel 4, having a 91.8 score against 81.9. The Galaxy A71 5G construction has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 4, but it is heavier. Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Google Pixel 4 has a little better performance than Galaxy A71 5G. They have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh. The Galaxy A71 5G has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy A71 5G costs a little more money than the Google Pixel 4, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.