Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4, getting an 84.9 score against 81.9. The Samsung Galaxy A80 construction is thicker and way heavier than Google Pixel 4. The Google Pixel 4 features a little better processing power than Galaxy A80, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Google Pixel 4 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 takes much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a much larger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A80 features better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.