Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than Google Pixel 4, getting a 90.5 score against 81.9. Even being the best phone in this review, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G construction is heavier and a little thicker than the Google Pixel 4. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's processing unit is very similar to Google Pixel 4's CPU, both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel count in each inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Galaxy A90 5G features a better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way more MP camera and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.