Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-24 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, having a score of 81.9 against 81. Google Pixel 4's design is a lot newer and lighter than the Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it is also thicker. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cores.
Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2280px resolution and a little greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.