Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s 79.3 general score. The Google Pixel 4 body is much newer than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it's thicker and just a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a brighter display than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a quite higher pixel density.
Galaxy S6 edge+ has as much storage for games and applications as the Google Pixel 4 one, they have equal internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4 features a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light captures and a tinier back camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 4 is also a lot cheaper, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.