Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro, getting a overall score of 81.9 against 78.8. Despite of the fact Google Pixel 4 is older and just a bit thicker than the vivo X60 Pro, it's construction is still a little bit lighter. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 features a little more vivid display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a bit higher screen pixel density. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with higher video frame rate, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
The vivo X60 Pro has a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. Vivo X60 Pro features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.