Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 5s's 76.4 global score. Google Pixel 4 is a heavier phone than Xiaomi Mi 5s, but both are equally thin. Xiaomi Mi 5s has a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, a quite worse pixels count per inch in the screen and a bit smaller screen.
Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more cores. The Google Pixel 4 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a back-facing camera with more mega pixels and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi 5s has just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 14 percent more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 4 is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.