Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4, getting an 85.5 score against 81.9. Despite being the best device in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 design is older, heavier and just a little bit thicker than Google Pixel 4. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1's processor is just as good as the processing unit in Google Pixel 4, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has more RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density and a bit lower 1080 x 2246 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger display. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures, a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera and a worse (4K) video quality, they both have a same size sensor.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 256 GB and 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs more than the Google Pixel 4, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.