Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is a bit better than the Apple iPhone 11 Pro's general score of 84.9. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction has the same thickness than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, but it's somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 4a 5G works with Android 11 operating system, and Apple iPhone 11 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a more powerful processor than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone 11 Pro features a better looking display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a quite higher pixel density.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G and the iPhone 11 Pro feature very similar cameras, and although the iPhone 11 Pro has a back camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution, a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing images and video in low-light environments, they both have a same size camera sensor.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has superior battery performance than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 28 percent larger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.