Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a bit better than the Google Nexus 6P, having an 87.5 score against 80.3. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G is just a little bit thicker than Google Nexus 6P, it's a little lighter and extremely newer. Google Nexus 6P counts with a little bit better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Google Nexus 6P's memory capacity for applications and games is just as good as the Google Pixel 4a 5G one, both of them have equal internal memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit superior processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a slightly better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, a smaller camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and images and a back camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Google Pixel 4a 5G not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.