Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is better than the LG V20's 77 overall score. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is much newer and a little bit lighter than LG V20's, but it's a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has more RAM and more cpu cores.
The LG V20 has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a little bit higher count of pixels per inch of screen. LG V20 features a way bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than LG V20, because although it has a camera with a much worse resolution and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor and a bigger camera aperture for better images in poorly lited environments. Google Pixel 4a 5G features superior battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 21 percent more battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG V20, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.