Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 score. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is newer, a little lighter and a little bit thinner than LG V50 ThinQ. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a newer 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a quite larger display and a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 4a 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
LG V50 ThinQ features a camera that's very similar to the camera in Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although the LG V50 ThinQ has a tinier back camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and images, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better captures and video in low light situations.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V50 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG V50 ThinQ, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.