Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than Motorola Droid Turbo, with an 87.5 score against 76.4. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is much newer, a bit lighter and thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixel amount per inch of screen. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and 3 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G takes clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a lot less mega-pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light images.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a battery performance that is very similar to the battery lifetime in Google Pixel 4a 5G, although the Motorola Droid Turbo also has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4a 5G, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.