Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 77.9. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a much newer device, and it's also notably thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a little faster processor than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 4 less CPU cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional GPU. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per inch of display.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola DROID Turbo's battery duration is very similar to Google Pixel 4a 5G's battery duration, although the Motorola DROID Turbo also has 3900mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Google Pixel 4a 5G captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photography in low light situations.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.