Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 overall score. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. Despite of the fact the Google Pixel 4a 5G is older and just a little thicker than Motorola Edge 50, it's design is still just a bit lighter.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 has a more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a bit bigger display, a just a bit more pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 has greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 features a better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a lot higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.