Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, getting an 87.5 score against 79.7. These phones work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide you the same operating system features. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G Stylus, although both were only released 7 months apart.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better processing unit than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little higher screen density.
Moto G Stylus shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a way larger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Moto G Stylus has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus counts with a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3885mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.