Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 416 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A32's 84.7 general score. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a somewhat lighter and thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy A32, even when they were released only a few months apart. The Google Pixel 4a 5G comes with Android 11 operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android operating system.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a lot greater display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 has better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy A32 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a much higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.