Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A80's score of 84.9. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer device, and it's also extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy A80. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater screen pixels density. The Galaxy A80 counts with as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Google Pixel 4a 5G one, both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A80 has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images and/or video in low-light situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much better resolution back camera.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A80, because it has a 5% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.