Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, having a global score of 90.5 against 87.5. Although it's the best in this comparison review, we must tell that it is also an older, just a little thicker and heavier cellphone. The Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, and Google Pixel 4a 5G has Android 11 operating system.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G. They have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photos and/or video in low light situations and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.