Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M30s's general score of 83.3. Both phones we are comparing work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is newer, a bit thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy M30s.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a little bit greater count of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also counts with a much better 48 MP resolution camera and a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Galaxy M30s counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M30s counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 54 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.