Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a score of 87.5 against 77.8. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is extremely lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is a lot thicker and was released 3 years before. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has an older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a much better performing processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much bigger sensor shooting much higher quality photos and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.