Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is much better than the vivo X60 Pro's score of 78.8. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is just a bit lighter but just a little bit thicker than vivo X60 Pro, and they were released with only a few months difference.
Vivo X60 Pro has a screen that's very similar to Google Pixel 4a 5G's display, because although the vivo X60 Pro has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and a quite bigger display. The vivo X60 Pro features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
The vivo X60 Pro has just a little better performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a much more MP camera and a way larger camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.