Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is a bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, with an 87.5 score against 85.5. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it's also just a bit lighter and just a little thinner than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2246 resolution and a just a bit worse pixels density, they both have a same size screen. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and Google Pixel 4a 5G both count with really similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a worse video quality, a camera with less mega pixels resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is more expensive than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Pocophone F1. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4a 5G, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.