Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Just black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4a, getting a global score of 84.9 against 82.9. IPhone 11 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Google Pixel 4a comes with Android 11 OS. The iPhone 11 Pro design has the same thickness than Google Pixel 4a, but it is much heavier. IPhone 11 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a display of the same size, the iPhone 11 Pro also has a slightly higher 1125 x 2436px resolution and a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The iPhone 11 Pro has a greater processing power than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 2 lesser cores and 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro shoots slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and videos in low-light environments, a less megapixels resolution camera and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, they both have the same camera sensor size.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit longer battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 3 percent larger battery size.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4a. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 4a, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.