Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Just black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than the LG V20, having an 82.9 score against 77. Google Pixel 4a's body is notably newer and lighter, but also just a little bit thicker than LG V20. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit better performance than LG V20, because it has a greater number of faster cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V20 has just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. LG V20 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photos and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG V20 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
LG V20 counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V20 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 2% larger battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG V20, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.