Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Just black | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having a score of 82.9 against 76.4. The Google Pixel 4a design is newer, way thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has the previous 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less cpu cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a much better screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has worse 24 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a lot higher 20.7 mega pixels resolution camera.
Google Pixel 4a has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola Droid Turbo features better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.