Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Just black | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo's score of 77.9. Google Pixel 4a is a much newer phone, and it's also somewhat lighter and thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a has 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a better screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 less CPU cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and video in low light environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola DROID Turbo features greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.