Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Just black | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 global score. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. Despite of the fact Google Pixel 4a is a lot older and just a bit thicker than Motorola Edge 50, it's design is still way lighter.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same display pixel density, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 50 has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 has a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way larger camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.