Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Just black | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than the Moto G Stylus, with a score of 82.9 against 79.7. Both phones we are comparing come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Google Pixel 4a is a incredibly lighter and thinner cellphone than Moto G Stylus, even though both of them were only released 4 months apart.
Google Pixel 4a features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Google Pixel 4a has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same video definition, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a lot larger sensor and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Moto G Stylus counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G Stylus also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a costs more than Motorola Moto G Stylus, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.