Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Just black | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, having an 82.9 score against 79.9. Even when the Google Pixel 4a and OPPO Find X3 Pro were released only a couple of months apart, the Google Pixel 4a is a lot lighter and a little bit thinner. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 operating system.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little bit better display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a little more pixels per inch of screen, a higher 1440 x 3216px resolution and a larger display.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and better 60 fps video frame rate.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.