Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Just black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 444 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a's general score of 82.9. Galaxy A32's design is somewhat thicker and way heavier than the Google Pixel 4a. The Galaxy A32 has Android OS, while Google Pixel 4a works with Android 11 OS.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 4a has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Galaxy A32 counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 takes better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy A32 features a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 59 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.