Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-20 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Just black | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 score. The Google Pixel 4a is a way newer and incredibly lighter phone than the Galaxy C9 Pro, but it's also somewhat thicker. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has the older 11 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor. Google Pixel 4a has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels per screen inch and a little higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB. Galaxy C9 Pro features superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.