Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Just black | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 general score. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide the user the same operating system features. Although the Google Pixel 4a and vivo X60 Pro were released with only a couple months difference, Google Pixel 4a's body is just a little thicker but extremely lighter than vivo X60 Pro.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit better looking display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The vivo X60 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution, faster video frame rate and a much bigger camera sensor shooting way higher quality photos and videos.
Vivo X60 Pro has a much greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The vivo X60 Pro has greater battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 34% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.