Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Just black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4a, with an 85.5 score against 82.9. Despite being the best in this comparison, Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design is older, extremely heavier and just a little bit thicker than Google Pixel 4a. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246px and a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and videos in low light situations and a worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera, they both have a 0.39 inches sensor.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27 percent bigger battery capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is more expensive than Google Pixel 4a, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.