Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than Google Nexus 6P, having a score of 89 against 80.3. Google Pixel 5's construction is newer and somewhat lighter than Google Nexus 6P's, but it's also a little thicker. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 5 also has 5 GB more RAM.
Google Nexus 6P has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Google Nexus 6P's memory capacity for applications and games is just as good as the Google Pixel 5 one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory.
Google Pixel 5 features a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a worse 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a lower video quality and a smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments.
Google Pixel 5 features improved battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 5 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.