Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 global score. Google Pixel 5 is a notably newer phone, and it is also much thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo. The Motorola DROID Turbo features just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 4 less cores and 5 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a brighter screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Google Pixel 5 captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a way less megapixels back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light images and video.
The Google Pixel 5 features a very superior memory for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 5% more battery size.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.