Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50, having a global score of 89 against 81.2. Google Pixel 5 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50, but they are equally thin. Google Pixel 5 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50. They have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a quite larger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a bit higher screen pixels density. The Motorola Edge 50 captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Motorola Edge 50 has much more memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with longer battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.