Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus's 79.7 general score. The Google Pixel 5 construction is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G Stylus, although both were released only 6 months apart. The Google Pixel 5 has a little sharper display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better number of pixels per inch of screen and a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Moto G Stylus shoots better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size aperture, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos.
Google Pixel 5 has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 5 is way more expensive than Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.