Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's global score of 79.9. Google Pixel 5's construction is a little thinner and way lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, even when they were only released 6 months apart. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 3216px resolution and a little bit better pixel density.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 50 MP resolution and a way bigger sensor.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.