Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 430 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A32's overall score of 84.7. The Google Pixel 5 is a extremely lighter and somewhat thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy A32, even though both of them were only released 3 months apart. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a way better display pixels density. Galaxy A32 features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with superior battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.