Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Just black and Sorta sage | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 548.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4080mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is slightly better than Galaxy A80, having a general score of 89 against 84.9. The Google Pixel 5 design is newer, thinner and lighter than Galaxy A80. Google Pixel 5 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A80 has as much memory capacity to install games and applications as the Google Pixel 5, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 5 counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A80. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU. Google Pixel 5 has just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 4080mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in poorly lited situations and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a way bigger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.